Zed Shaw's infamous meltdown showed an angry man lashing out at anything and everything. It made a lot of people sad. It made me especially sad because this didn't feel like the same Zed that I had dinner with in Chicago or that I had talked to so many times before. I actually thought he might be in real trouble and in need of real help, but was assured by third party that he wasn't (Zed never replied to my emails after publishing).

Ruby on Rails has been around for more than five years. It's only natural that the public perception of what Rails is today is going to include bits and pieces from it's own long history of how things used to be.

Many things are not how they used to be. And plenty of things are, but got spun in a way to seem like they're not by people who had either an axe to grind, a competing offering to push, or no interest in finding out.

I’m putting the final touches on a super-sweet versioning plugin, and I’ve discovered that we’re using several different metaphors for configuring the plugin options. I’d like to get some opinions/feedback on your preferred style.

The DSL

Using a DSL and passing blocks in which get instance evalled. I’m normally very scathing of DSLs; I think that they’re Yet Another Language for people to learn to use – it’s usually your very own write-only syntax – but it’s been super-fun implementing the backend to this.

While installing Globalize I stumbled upon the plug in’s table structure. If we look at the ‘tr_key’ field inside the table ‘globalize_translations’ we may notice that this field type is ‘VARCHAR (255)’ (obviously only under mysql but I think this
is the database chosen by the majority of rails developers).

Hey, but isn’t this column the one holding the strings to be translated?

The answer is (ASAIK) yes, in fact if we look inside file ‘view_translation.rb’ (inside the plug in’s models’ folder) we spot this piece of code: